Pauly's Craps system in action: 6a.System in action:which is steps 1 through 5 into action accordingly place your bet which is $10 on the field bet if you lose place $20 on next roll if you lose.
Unbeatable Craps System
Unbeatable Craps System Free
Unbeatable Craps System
Betting Systems
Whats really bad are people who take your money in exchange for some kind of unbeatable craps system. These craps systems are NOT unbeatable. In fact, in the long run, they cant win. You cant defeat the math at the craps table by combining various bets at the table. There are NO craps bets with a positive expectation.
We don't know of any other Craps system that passed the entire 72 hour test without showing a loss. GUARANTEE DC-7 is sold with a guarantee that the test results supplied are accurate and authentic within a 5 margin of error, taken from the book '72 Hours at the Crap Table' utilizing the instructions and rules outlined in the DC-7 package.
Craps is all about the betting, not the dice roll. Knowing when and how to bet will make you invincible when you play crapswhether you play craps online or in casinos. These 5 simple tips on how to win at craps will improve your odds of winning while playing craps.
Betting systems fall into the broad categories of betting the same after each decision, known as flat betting, raising wagers after wins, called positive progressions, and raising money after losses, named negative progressions,
There are also systems which have characteristics of one or more of these types, such as the Baccarat Attack Strategy Betting System which we will encounter in a few more chapters.Many of the classical betting systems were developed for roulette in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, but can be used for other games with even-money wagers such as craps, baccarat and blackjack.Although none of these systems in its pure form is a winning system, it is worthwhile to study the efforts of our ancestors as these betting systems are the grandparents of every modern betting system. Unbeatable Craps System
Martingale
Martingale is one of the oldest betting systems using a negative progression.It is named after Henry Martingale, an English casino owner in the 1700s who is reputed to urge losing punters to 'double 'em up' with their wagers.
This system is very simple.You will use a betting series where each bet in the series is twice as large as the preceding one, as with 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32.So long as you win a bet, you will continue to bet at the lowest level, e.g. wager 1.If you lose a bet, you will move up to the next wager, doubling the amount of the previous wager.Use of the system ensures that whenever your wager eventually wins, you will win the amount of the original wager, in this instance 1.
One of my gambling friends once told me about an amazing system he had developed for craps.He had gone to Las Vegas on two consecutive trips and returned a winner.He was wagering only on don't pass at casino craps using a betting series starting with a $1 bet and doubling his bet after each loss.He was certain that his risk of loss was very small and planned to continue to use the system.He was reluctant to share the system with me but he finally confessed that he was using the following betting series, increasing his wager one level following a loss:1 2 4 8 16 32 64 128 256.He correctly pointed out that he would have to lose nine times in a row to lose the betting series, and he just didn't think that this was possible.
377Bet Casino Review Sports Betting and Casino Games from Betsoft, NetEnt and Playson The homepage of 377Bet is firmly focused on the sportsbook at the site with the range of sports listed down the left hand side, the betting slip on the right, with a live schedule and betting options clear in the centre of the page. Megastar Casino. MSC. 377. Willis, OK 73439. Premium Fuel. Mid-Grade Fuel. Diesel Fuel. ATM. Beer Cave. Hot Food To-Go. Online casino casino 377 welcomes you! Congratulations - now you are not just a guest, but a full member of the Casino377 Club, where the best slots are collected. Your journey in the world of gambling is just beginning, so play at your pleasure, discover new interesting machines, save VIP points. Megastar Casino, located just north of the Texas border along U.S. Highway 377 is Lake Texomas premier gambling destination. 377 casino game .
I pointed out to him that there was a very real possibility that he could lose nine decisions in a row; in fact, this would happen once about every 500 pass line - don't pass decisions.With craps decisions averaging fifty to sixty per hour, a loss of all nine wagers could happen once every eight to ten hours.I asked him to consider whether he was winning enough to sustain a loss of $511.00 (the total amount he was risking) in order to win the sum of $1.This must have impressed him as I don't think he ever used this system again (or at least he didn't tell me about losing with it).
The Martingale system would be just about unbeatable if you could continue to double your wagers until you finally won a bet. Modern casinos are very aware of Martingale, and they know that the easiest way to thwart the system is to narrow the spread between maximum and minimum bets allowed.In other words, the minimum wager must be high enough and the maximum wager low enough that no more than eight or nine doublings can occur.If you find a table with a low minimum, such as $1 and a high maximum, such as $3,000, you may wish to try using aMartingale system against the table.
You could use the following series of wagers: 1 2 4 8 16 32 64 128 256 512 1,024 2,048.With 12 bets in the series, you would be an odds-on favorite to win any weekend gambling contest involving even-money wagers.However, you might want to consider one thing.If you try this, sooner or later you will lose bet number 11, for $1,024.You will now have lost $2,047 and will be called on to bet $2,048 in order to win the grand sum of $1.Are you willing to risk it?If you win, you will be up exactly one buck for your efforts.However, if you lose your last wager of $2,048, you will have lost$4,095 in the gaming contest. While the risk of loss is low, it will happen at some time if you continue to wager this way, and there is no guarantee that it won't happen during your first casino excursion using this system.
Mini-Martingale
Martingale in its purest form is too risky for the amount of reward offered.Nearly every gambling expert likes to cite Martingale as an example of a losing system and then jump into a gloating mode and proclaim that all betting systems are losers.However, a Martingale system can be used with very good results if it is used on a spot basis. Assume that you are wagering on an even-money game and that you have lost the last four consecutive wagers.Usually, a three-stage Martingale against this trend continuing for three more decisions will be quite profitable and the reward will be reasonable as compared to the amount risked.
A five-stage Martingale progression can be used very profitably when it is used against a betting pattern which is less likely to occur than would normally be expected.
Grand Martingale
One criticism of Martingale is that too much is risked as compared to the potential return.For example, in the first Martingale series shown, you would have had to wager $256 in order to win a net $1.With Grand Martingale, additional chips are added to each increasedwager,so thatwhen awinfinallyoccurs, the amount won will be greater than just the amount of the first wager.A typical Grand Martingale series is: 1 3 5 15 35 75.
Martingale in all forms risks a lot to win a little.When the losses come, they will wipe out hours of profits.Another twist to using a Martingale series is to play Martingale in reverse, called an 'Anti-Martingale' betting series.With this system, winning wagers will be pressed (doubled).Whenever you encounter a long winning streak this system can produce phenomenal profits.Assume we use the following Anti-Martingale series:5 10 20 40 80.With five consecutive wins, we will $155, while our total risk is only the amount of our first wager, $5.The high-risk reward ratio is a major reason raising your wagers after wins is recommended by many gaming experts.However, as we saw two chapters back, this type of system wins very infrequently, and the many small losses overwhelm most gains, so that over 90 of all games will end with a loss.
Labouchere
With Labouchere, also known as the Cancellation System, the player sets up a series of numbers which will add up to the profit he will make if he wins this betting series.If he picks 1 2 3 as his series, his expected profit for winning this series is 1 + 2 + 3 = 6.Like the variations of Martingale, this series is used with even-money bets.
To start the series, a player will wager the sum of the two outside numbers, in this case 4(1 +3 = 4).If he wins this wager, he will cancel the two outside numbers by scratching them out, and wager the sum of the next two outside numbers.In this simple series, only the single number of 2 is left, so the player would wager 2.Ifhe also wins this wager, he will have won the series, having won 4 on the first round and 2 for the second wager, for a total of 6, the total of all bets in the series.
Any time the player loses a wager, he will add the amount lost to the series and continue to wager the sum of the two outside wagers.Let's assume the player lost the first bet of 4.He would add this wager to the series, which would now become:1 2 3 4.His next wager would be for 5, the sum of the two outside wagers.We will assume that this bet wins.Having won the bet, our players cancels the outside numbers of 1 and 4 leaving the series as: 2 3.He next wagers the sum of these two numbers, betting 5.If this wager wins the series is completed.If he loses this wager, the losing bet of 5 will be added to the series and he will continue the series.
The principal appeal of this system is that it appears to be a two for one proposition in that each win cancels two numbers while a loss only adds one number to the series.However, this isn't the case, as the player is not paid two for one on winning bets.
In testing this system, I have had bets escalate to wagers of hundreds of dollars all too frequently.This is probably the most insidious of the old time roulette systems.It is said to have been responsible for more suicides on the French Riviera than any other system.Part of the problem with this system is that the small stream of steady wins tends to lull the player into believing that the system can't lose.Unfortunately, a long enough losing streak will occur that the wagers called for will either be larger than the player's bankroll or will exceed the house limits and not be allowed.In either case, the series will be over with the end result that the player suffers a substantial loss.
Bar le casino alma qc news . This system can also be played in reverse, known as Reverse Labouchere.With Reverse Labby, as many punters call it, the amount of each win is added to the series, and the two outside numbers are canceled whenever a loss occurs.Each wager is still the sum of the two outside numbers.This system produces many small losses in exchange for an occasional win over 1,000 times the amount at risk.
Use of this approach is recounted in Norman Leigh's fascinating account of his successful effort to beat the casino in Monte Carlo by playing Labouchere in reverse ( Thirteen Against the Bank , William Morrow Co., 1976).Norman Leigh theorized that the reason so many players lose with Labouchere is that they run into the house limits or lose their playing capital and are unable to recoup losses.Since the bank has almost unlimited capital in comparison to the players, the bank can out wait most player assaults, knowing that either the house betting limit or the player's own limited financial resources will bring about the player's demise.
In using the reverse betting strategy, Leigh reasoned that this approach would most closely resemble the bank's approach to most other players. He would wait out the small losses until a large win occurred. Leigh spent months recruiting and training a team to play against the casino.His trials in pulling off this coup make for fascinating reading.I believe that one of the reasons he was eventually able to beat the casino in Monte Carlo was that his starting wagers were fairly low and the house maximums large in comparison. Consequently, he was able to keep his losses fairly low while his team played on, waiting for the monster win.
It is doubtful that this system could be used successfully now, as the spread between minimum and maximum wagers is not large enough in most casinos.The losses realized while waiting for the large win would be enormous, with the house limits on maximum wagers limiting the systems' ability to ultimately recoup the losses.
D'Alembert
This system was invented by a French mathematician, based on the assumption of equilibrium in gaming contests.D'Alembert reasoned that since winning and losing bets must eventually equal one another, a system of adding one chip after each losing bet and subtracting a chip after a winning bet would ultimately result in a win as winning wagers would always be greater than losing ones.
It is not unusual to win only ten of the first thirty wagers in an even-money betting contest.With d'Alembert's system, the player will wager higher and higher amounts until he eventually runs into our old nemesis, the house limit.
D'Alembert can be fairly successful if it is modified to include no more than nine or ten bets in a series of wagers, so that potential losses are limited.An additional modification to improve the system is to space the bets so that the win of two consecutive wagers will offset prior losses.A series which accomplishes this is 1 2 3 4 7 11 18.With this series, a player would drop back to the lowest bet after winning two consecutive wagers, such as 7 and 4.This system can be fairly successful if used by two partners betting the opposite in roulette, craps or baccarat.
Contra-d-Alembert
Like Reverse Labouchere, the idea behind Contra-d'Alembert is to reduce the amount risked while allowing profitable runs to rise to great heights.With this strategy we will increase our wager one level after a win and reduce it a level following a loss.
The only positive aspect to the strategy is that when you hit a prolonged losing streak the size of your wagers is quickly reduced.In this respect this system can help protect your bankroll.
However, the upside of using any system requiring increasing your wager following wins is limited.Trends of long, uninterrupted winning streaks are fairly rare in gaming and a system relying on piling up win after consecutive win is not going to win very often.
Here's an example.Your first bet is for one unit.You win and move up to betting two units.With another win, you wager three units and have a loss.You have won two out of three bets and have absolutely nothing to show for it.All of your profit evaporated with that single loss.
If you could always pick your spots, this system would have merit.Of course, if pigs could fly . . .well, you get the idea.It is just about impossible to know in advance when a three-wager consecutive win might occur so that you couldjump in with aContra-d'Alembert.Like so many systems, this one sounds good on paper, but is difficult to squeeze profits out of in real world gaming.
Ascot
This is another of the old time roulette systems that can be adapted to any game offering even-money bets.With Ascot, winning wagers are increased one unit at a time in a predetermined series of wagers while losing bets are lowered one step using the same betting series.An Ascot betting series can be from seven toeleven numbers.A typical series is:2 3 5 8 13 20 30.The player's first wager would be a middle number such as 8.If this wager wins, the next wager would be 13.If this wager also won, the succeeding wager would be for 20, and so on, with each win followed by an increase of one level in the betting series.The series would end with the win of the last bet in the series.For a win, that would be a win of 30.A losing series would be terminated with the loss of the lowest bet of 2.
The greatest problem with Ascot is that alternating wins and losses at the higher levels of wagers will destroy the profit potential of the series.This can be a serious flaw in any system calling for a large reduction in the amount wagered following a loss.
The Fibonacci System
Fibonacci was a mathematician who discovered a series of numbers where the sum of each two numbers in the series equals the number which follows.A Fibonacci series with twelve levels of bets would look like:1 2 3 5 8 13 21 34 55 89 144 233 for a total risked of $608.
This is a very low risk system for use with even-money bets at craps, roulette and baccarat.To use it, you will increase your bet one level following a loss.After any win, you drop your next wager one level.If you win two bets in a row, or win two out of three bets, you drop back to the first bet in the series.
This system was sold many years ago for $100 a copy with instructions to use it betting don't pass in craps.This is a good system for partners to use betting opposites.With roulette, for instance, one partner could bet red while the other wagered black.With craps, one would wager on pass line and the other on don't pass.With baccarat, one partner would bet banker and the other on player hands.
Incidentally, there are a number of derivations of the Fibonacci series of numbers, including ratios of the numbers, which are regularly used in trading stocks and commodity future contracts. This is indeed a versatile and powerful sequence of numbers.
The Parlay
A parlay or paroli is a positive progression method. In its simplest form, it consists of leaving a winning bet plus the winnings up for a second win.If you are betting $10 on an even-money bet and win $10, you parlay the wager by leaving $20 up for the next decision.If this bet wins, you will have won $30 while only risking $10.
Probably the most attractive aspect of a successful parlay is that it wins three times as much as the amount risked.However, the probability of winning two bets in a row on even-money wagers is less than one in four.For this reason, one of the better ways to use a parlay is to combine it with a series of bets where the amount wagered is increased following a loss.For example the following parlay progression could be used:2 2 3 4 6 8 12 16.To use this series, you would normally start with the first wager in the series.If this bet won, you would parlay it and next wager $4.If either the original wager or the parlay lost you would move up one level in the betting series.Any time a parlay bet is won, you will start the betting series over.If the series is lost, you may either start the series over or leave the table.
Setting up parlay progressions like the one above can be the basis for some of the best performing betting progressions in gambling.To use such a series in blackjack, which requires additional money in order to handle pair splitting and doublings, requires adjustments to the series.One way to handle this is to modify basic strategy to reduce the number of splitting and doubling plays.However, this is not a wise way to play blackjack as these moves represent one of the player's strongest winning options.A better way to handle the program of developing a winning parlay progression for blackjack is to modify the progression so that it allows for splitting and doubling opportunities.
Oscar's Grind
If you want to use a system with very little risk of loss, here's the one you want.
Oscar has a target of winning one unit at the end of any successful betting series.That's it.One unit.Here are the rules:
1.Increase your bet by one unit after every win; provided that winning the wager won't result in a series gain larger then one unit.
2.Never change the size of your bet following a loss.
Assume that your betting unit is $5 and you are betting don't pass.You find yourself fighting a hot streak and you have lost six bets in a row for a cumulative loss of $30.You continue to bet $5 since you never change the size of your wager following losses.You bet $5 again and win.Now, with one win and six losses, you are down a net $25.Following the win, you raise your bet one unit and wager $10.This wager also wins.You have reduced your net loss to $15.You raise your next wager one more unit to $15 and win.You are now even.Your final wager will revert to $5.Why?Because of the rule limiting the size of a wager to one which will not result in a gain larger than one unit.
Your last bet of $5 wins.You now have a net win of $5, having lost six bets and won four.
Even this system can take you to high levels on occasion.If you find yourself in a situation where you have occasional wins followed by multiple losses, the size of your wagers will continue to grow.If you run into this situation, you will be forced to stop the series at some point and accept a loss, rather than risking larger and larger amounts of money.
Patrick's System
John Patrick, a professional gambler turned writer, presented another positive betting system for blackjack, which can also be used for baccarat.In his John Patrick's Blackjack (Carol Publishing Group, 1995) he describes his system.He uses a system with both progressive and regressive attributes.With his system, you will start with a wager at least twice as large as the table minimum so that you have room to reduce the size of your bet after wins.After your first win, your next wager will be one-half the size of the first winning wager.For instance, if your base bet is $10 and you win, you will wager $5 next.After any net loss you will revert to the original starting bet.However, if you can manage to win the second bet in a series, you will return to the two-unit bet and increase the amount wagered after any additional win.
A series of six wins at a $10 minimum table would look like:20 10 20 30 40 50 for a total of $170 won.
Patrick suggests a way to limit losses by quitting if you lose the first four hands in a shoe or deck.
The above was taken from the book - Baccarat Attack Strategy.
Click Here for Access to Baccarat Attack Strategy
Gamblers Bookcase
5901-J Wyoming NE Suite 305
Albuquerque NM 87109
1998 - 2013 Gamblers Bookcase All Rights Reserved
Email Contact Have you ever heard of the craps pro? I can honestly say that I have been playing this craps method for a year now and over the long run I have been winning 60 of my bets with the casino paying me odds on the place bets. I'm one of the crazies out here that believe that this works. I have tried many systems and spent thousands of dollars believing there must be a way to beat the casino over the long haul. Nothing worked until I purchased this method. I'm a true believer and my wallet shows it, or maybe hundreds of hours at the table is not enough time to prove it to be true I'll let you know how I do over the next year. If you haven't heard of this method than research it and prove me wrong. Unbeatable Craps System Free
Although I have tested a lot of systems, I don't need to test all of them to know they are all worthless. No system can ever pass the test of time. It is not unusual to win for a while with a system, but if you keep playing the odds will eventually catch up to you and you will fall behind.
For more information about the futility of betting systems, please see The Truth about Betting Systems. Let me begin by saying that of all the gambling related sites, the Wizard of Odds is by far the best. My question has to do with a betting strategy for craps. My question has to do with what some people have termed variance. As you state in your Ten commandments, the house has an edge in the long term, but there are short term fluctuations.
A casino I played at had the 3,4,5 odds system where you were allowed 3x on the 4 and 10, 4x on the 5 and 9 and 5 x on the 6 and 8. I feel that with this 'system' of placing odds, you reduce the fluctuations (with respect to standard 5x odds on all numbers) in your bankroll, and change the distribution of net gain/loss per session, i.e. you would produce a sharper peak located slightly more to the loss side than with 5x odds. Is this so, and could you put some numbers to it?
That is known as 3-4-5X odds, and is now pretty common. The following table shows all the possible outcomes, for the pass and odds combined, with full odds.
Return Table with 3-4-5X Odds Event Pays Probability Return Pass line win 1 0.222222 0.222222 Pass line loss -1 0.111111 -0.111111 Point of 4 or 10 win 7 0.055556 0.388889 Point of 4 or 10 lose -4 0.111111 -0.444444 Point of 5 or 9 win 7 0.088889 0.622222 Point of 5 or 9 lose -5 0.133333 -0.666667 Point of 6 or 8 win 7 0.126263 0.883838 Point of 6 or 8 lose -6 0.151515 -0.909091 Total 1.000000 -0.014141
The standard deviation per pass line bet is 4.915632. As a moderate craps player who is of course interested in receiving every 'comp' possible, could you give advice on the best betting (craps) strategy. Tried to find it in your GREAT web site.
Unlike most gambling writers, I don't put much emphasis on betting strategies. Assuming the same game and bet, there is no one right or wrong strategy. They all behave differently in the short run, but in the long run you will give the house the same percentage of total money bet. I like your site very much. It is very informative. Thanks for putting out your thoughts. I noticed a betting strategy for craps suggested at Crappers Delight called 'classic regression'. In it he suggests, placing a 6 and 8, after a point is established. Then taking it down after one of them is hit. He said there are 10 combined ways to make the 6 and 8, but only 6 combined ways to make the 7. It sounds logical, but I've seen where you are able to show, that what appears logical on the surface is not so bright once it is analyzed. What are your thoughts on this strategy and what would the true odds be, if you did take the bets down after one hit?
This is similar to a question I got last week. Yes, it is true that there are ten ways to roll a 6 or 8, and six ways to roll a 7. However, one must not look at the probabilities alone, but weight them against the payoffs. The place bet on the 6 and 8 pays 7 to 6 odds when fair odds would pay 6 to 5. By making six unit place bets on the 6 and 8, and taking the other down if one wins, the probability of winning 7 units is 62.5 and the probability of losing 12 units is 37.5. If the player must cover both the 6 and 8, then the place bet is the way to go. This rate of return isn't bad but could be better. For the player who puts a priority on minimizing the overall house edge, the best strategy is to make combinations of pass, don't pass, come, and don't come bets, and always take the maximum allowable odds. What is the better system, or which gives me the better chance to win on craps? On the come out roll, I bet $10 on the dont and $10 on the do, and then when a point comes out I lay full odds against the number. Or is it better to just play the dont pass, and then lay the odds. I think getting passed the come out roll will increase my chances of winning.
The better system is to bet on the don't pass only and take full odds. Yes, betting on both does increase you chances of winning on any one bet. However you are suffering a higher combined house edge by betting on both the pass and don't pass and it will cost you in the long run. I played craps for the first time the other night and went from $70 to $700 with small bets on the pass odds and field bets. I then lost it all down to $6 because my bets were too large (by the dealers suggestion), and gained it back to $1000 after slowing down. For this being the first time it seems like a very easy game to win if you have patience, was it beginners luck?
Yes, it was luck. It helped that you stuck to the low house edge bets. However, next time, make the line bets with odds only, and don't bet the field, especially if it pays 2 to 1 only on both the 2 and 12. In craps, could one gain an advantage over the house by making both a Pass and Don't Pass bet (one unit each) and then playing the Don't Pass odds? Although the occasional 12 would steal one unit here and there, it seems that the seven would have an advantage over the point. At triple odds one could take 3x on the 410, 2x on the 59 and 1x on the 68.
No combination of bets can give the player an advantage. Ordre de grandeur poker . In your example you would lose one unit for every 12 on the come out roll. You don't make up for it laying the odds. While you usually win laying the odds, you have to risk more. In the end, laying the odds has zero house edge. I love to play craps and would like your opinion on a conventional method of play. Pass line and two come bets with full double odds or with one come bet? Does having three different bets working superior to two?
As long as you are backing up your pass and come bets with full odds, it doesn't make any difference how many come bets you make. However, it does reduce the overall house edge to keep the odds on your come bets working on the come out roll. In craps, does the house edge change if you make a don't pass bet then remove it if the point is 6 or 8? What if you remove it if the point is 6,8,5,or 9?
You should never remove a don't pass bet after a point is made! Once a point is made of 6 or 8 the don't pass has equity of 9.09 of the bet amount, which you would be throwing away by taking the bet down. The equity of a don't pass bet on a point of 5 or 9 is 20, and on a 4 or 10 is 33.33. Id like your thoughts on this craps strategy. I think its a Patrick system for playing dont pass. Bet one unit on both pass and dont pass. Then lays odds on the dont side. You can stop here or then make a dont come bet. After the dc travels, take the odds off your dont pass bet (if you dont like to lay odds). So now you have a unit on the dont come that pretty much got there with less risk. I know you can never get the advantage over the house, but this seems like a great way to play the dont side. You eliminate the sevens on the come out roll. And only get hurt by the 12; or the 11 on your dont come bet. P.s. Your site is the greatest.
Thanks for the compliment on my site. The best thing I can say about this system is that it composed of low house edge bets. Yes, a 12 will lose the pass bet and push the dont pass on the come out roll, this is where the house edge is. By making the pass bet you are increasing the overall house edge. If youre afraid losing you shouldnt be playing at all. Never hedge your bets. So my advice is to stick to just the dont pass and laying odds. Yes, youll lose some on the come out roll. However if you dont lose on the come out roll the dont pass bet will usually win. I am a novice, just starting to play. My question concerns the 'Five Count Doey/Dont' System. The way I understand the system:
Wait until the shooter establishes a point.
Play both come/dont come (same amount). Until you have a maximum of four numbers
After the shooter has rolled five times without rolling a 7, take odds on all your numbers on the front side.
The rationale: Limit your exposure until you find a 'qualified' (five rolls without a 7) shooter. Only betting the odds so there is no 'house edge'! Can you compare this system with just playing pass/come and taking the odds?
As I stated in the other craps strategy question you are only mixing another house edge bet into the game by betting on both the pass and dont pass, or come and dont come. It is also not going to help to wait until a shooter hits five points. The probability of making a point is the same for me and you as it is for somebody who just threw 100 points in a row. In other words, the past does not matter. As I stated to the person who asked the other question (whom I think may also be you) dont make opposite bets, just stick to either the do or dont side and always back up your bets with the odds. The Kelly strategy for betting requires a positive edge to be effective. I play craps and I give the house less than a 1 edge. Once a week I get comps of $62. I gamble only 1 1/2 hours and my total betting doesnt reach $3000. Theoretically I earn approximately $30 per session. Would the Kelly strategy be helpful to me?
Unless bankroll preservation is very important to you then Kelly betting wont help. I would just flat bet. Nice strategy to milk the comp system. The American Mensa Guide to Casino Gambling has the following 'anything but seven' combination of craps bets that shows a net win on any number except 7. Here's how much MENSA advises to bet in the 'Anything but 7' system:
5- place $5
6- place $6
8- place $6
field- $5
total= $22 Unbeatable Craps System
They claim the house edge is 1.136. How is that possible if every individual bet made has a higher house edge?
Good question. To confirm their math I made the following table, based on a field bet paying 3 to 1 on a 12. The lower right cell does shows an expected loss of 25 cents over $22 bet. So the house edge is indeed .25/22 = 1.136.
Mensa Anything but Seven Combo Number Probability Field Place 5 Place 6 Place 8 Win Return 2 0.027778 10 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 10 0.277778 3 0.055556 5 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 5 0.277778 4 0.083333 5 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 5 0.416667 5 0.111111 -5 7 0.000000 0.000000 2 0.222222 6 0.138889 -5 0.000000 7 0.000000 2 0.277778 7 0.166667 -5 -5 -6 -6 -22 -3.666667 8 0.138889 -5 0.000000 0.000000 7 2 0.277778 9 0.111111 5 0 0.000000 0 5 0.555556 10 0.083333 5 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 5 0.416667 11 0.055556 5 0 0.000000 0.000000 5 0.277778 12 0.027778 15 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 15 0.416667 Total 1 -0.25
The reason the overall house edge appears to be less than the house edge of each individual bet is because the house edge on place bets is generally measured as expected player loss per bet resolved .
However, in this case the player is only keeping the place bets up for one roll. This significantly reduces the house edge on the place bets from 4.00 to 1.11 on the 5 and 9, and from 1.52 to 0.46 on the 6 and 8.
For you purists who think I am inconsistent in measuring the house edge on place bets as per bet resolved (or ignoring ties) then I invite you to visit my craps appendix 2 where all craps bets are measured per roll (including ties). What is the best way to make money at craps consistently?
Craig from Los Angeles
No. I had to Google this to find out what this is. This appears to me to be an amusing urban legend about some young scientists who developed a winning craps system. The story is told at Quatloos. I would file this under other fictional stories that have become mistaken for fact, like Joshuas missing day. As I have said hundreds of times, not only can betting systems not beat games like craps, they cant even dent the house edge. I have a question about a series of bets in craps. The strategy is called the 'Iron Cross.' It involves a bet on the 5, 6, 8, and the field. I read up on this, and found that this particular bet will pay on every roll that is not a 7. I was told that this gives you the lowest house edge. What are all the various odds and what-nots to go along with it?
If the player bets $5 on the field and 5, and $6 on the 6 and 8, then he will have a net win of $2 on the 5, 6, and 8, $10 on the 2, $15 on the 12, and $5 on the other field numbers, assuming that the 12 pays 3 to 1 on the field. The player will lose $22 on a 7. On a per roll basis, the player can expect to lose 25 cents compared to $22 in bets, for a house edge of 1.136.
This begs the question, why is this lower than the individual house edge of each bet made? Its not. The reason it seems that way is the result of comparing apples to oranges. The house edge of place bets is usually expressed as the expected loss per bet resolved. Looking at the individual bets on a per-roll basis, the house edge on the 5 is 1.11, and on the 6 and 8 is 0.46, according to my craps appendix 2. Comparing apples to apples, the house edge is a weighted average of the house edge on the field, 5, 6, and 8, on a per-roll basis, or (5/22)2.778 + (5/22)1.111 + (6/22)0.463 + (6/22)0.463 = 1.136. What is your opinion of the 5-Count strategy in craps?
For the benefit of other readers, the 5-Count is a method of slow-playing craps, as discussed in Golden Touch Dice Control Revolution by Frank Scoblete and Dominator. As the book states, it is a way of betting nothing on some rolls, reducing your expected loss on random shooters, while still getting the full comp value of table time.
The way the 5-Count works is you start counting rolls as soon as a new shooter throws any point number. When you get to five rolls after you start counting, the shooter is deemed worthy, and you start betting. However, you if the 5th roll is not a point number, it doesnt count.
The book says you will only be betting 43 of the time, which I agree with. It is common for craps players to not bet, bet small, or bet the dont pass on new shooters, as a way to qualify him. Once a shooter has made a point, or thrown lots of point numbers, the other players will gain confidence in him, and start betting with him. So, this kind of strategy seems natural. When casinos rate your average bet, they dont lower the average for betting nothing some of the time. However, sometimes they will dock your time, especially if you are betting big.
An alternative strategy is to wait until the shooter makes a point. Under this strategy you will only be betting 40.6 of the time, less than the 43.5 with the 5-Count. Imagine a craps player who takes maximum odds, say 10x, on his pass line and come bets reducing the house edge to 0.18. He avoids other bets that give the house a bigger edge. He is an 'astute' right bettor in every way except this: he is determined to lose. Through bankroll management, and a determined effort to only leave the table a 'loser,' he hopes he can look back on his years of craps playing and say, 'I wagered $1 million at the craps table over the years and gave back $50,000 to the house; because of my skill, I left 5 at the table.' Is he deluding himself? Is he doomed, in spite of his efforts to leave the table a loser every time, to only give the house roughly 0.18 or $1800?
Yes! Ive said many times that betting systems not only cant beat a house edge game, they cant even dent it. That includes denting it in the houses favor. In other words, even if he tried to lose, he still only gives up 0.18 over the long-run, under your assumptions. Over a shorter time, he probably could do this, but not over 'years.' Some might argue that to deliberately lose, the player should do an anti-Martingale, where the player kept pressing his bets until he lost. However, a problem there is that a winning player will eventually reach the table maximum, which is rather low in craps. It just goes to show how futile betting systems are.
Unbeatable Craps System
Unbeatable Craps System Free
Unbeatable Craps System
Betting Systems
Whats really bad are people who take your money in exchange for some kind of unbeatable craps system. These craps systems are NOT unbeatable. In fact, in the long run, they cant win. You cant defeat the math at the craps table by combining various bets at the table. There are NO craps bets with a positive expectation.
We don't know of any other Craps system that passed the entire 72 hour test without showing a loss. GUARANTEE DC-7 is sold with a guarantee that the test results supplied are accurate and authentic within a 5 margin of error, taken from the book '72 Hours at the Crap Table' utilizing the instructions and rules outlined in the DC-7 package.
Craps is all about the betting, not the dice roll. Knowing when and how to bet will make you invincible when you play crapswhether you play craps online or in casinos. These 5 simple tips on how to win at craps will improve your odds of winning while playing craps.
Betting systems fall into the broad categories of betting the same after each decision, known as flat betting, raising wagers after wins, called positive progressions, and raising money after losses, named negative progressions,
There are also systems which have characteristics of one or more of these types, such as the Baccarat Attack Strategy Betting System which we will encounter in a few more chapters.Many of the classical betting systems were developed for roulette in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, but can be used for other games with even-money wagers such as craps, baccarat and blackjack.Although none of these systems in its pure form is a winning system, it is worthwhile to study the efforts of our ancestors as these betting systems are the grandparents of every modern betting system. Unbeatable Craps System
Martingale
Martingale is one of the oldest betting systems using a negative progression.It is named after Henry Martingale, an English casino owner in the 1700s who is reputed to urge losing punters to 'double 'em up' with their wagers.
This system is very simple.You will use a betting series where each bet in the series is twice as large as the preceding one, as with 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32.So long as you win a bet, you will continue to bet at the lowest level, e.g. wager 1.If you lose a bet, you will move up to the next wager, doubling the amount of the previous wager.Use of the system ensures that whenever your wager eventually wins, you will win the amount of the original wager, in this instance 1.
One of my gambling friends once told me about an amazing system he had developed for craps.He had gone to Las Vegas on two consecutive trips and returned a winner.He was wagering only on don't pass at casino craps using a betting series starting with a $1 bet and doubling his bet after each loss.He was certain that his risk of loss was very small and planned to continue to use the system.He was reluctant to share the system with me but he finally confessed that he was using the following betting series, increasing his wager one level following a loss:1 2 4 8 16 32 64 128 256.He correctly pointed out that he would have to lose nine times in a row to lose the betting series, and he just didn't think that this was possible.
377Bet Casino Review Sports Betting and Casino Games from Betsoft, NetEnt and Playson The homepage of 377Bet is firmly focused on the sportsbook at the site with the range of sports listed down the left hand side, the betting slip on the right, with a live schedule and betting options clear in the centre of the page. Megastar Casino. MSC. 377. Willis, OK 73439. Premium Fuel. Mid-Grade Fuel. Diesel Fuel. ATM. Beer Cave. Hot Food To-Go. Online casino casino 377 welcomes you! Congratulations - now you are not just a guest, but a full member of the Casino377 Club, where the best slots are collected. Your journey in the world of gambling is just beginning, so play at your pleasure, discover new interesting machines, save VIP points. Megastar Casino, located just north of the Texas border along U.S. Highway 377 is Lake Texomas premier gambling destination. 377 casino game .
I pointed out to him that there was a very real possibility that he could lose nine decisions in a row; in fact, this would happen once about every 500 pass line - don't pass decisions.With craps decisions averaging fifty to sixty per hour, a loss of all nine wagers could happen once every eight to ten hours.I asked him to consider whether he was winning enough to sustain a loss of $511.00 (the total amount he was risking) in order to win the sum of $1.This must have impressed him as I don't think he ever used this system again (or at least he didn't tell me about losing with it).
The Martingale system would be just about unbeatable if you could continue to double your wagers until you finally won a bet. Modern casinos are very aware of Martingale, and they know that the easiest way to thwart the system is to narrow the spread between maximum and minimum bets allowed.In other words, the minimum wager must be high enough and the maximum wager low enough that no more than eight or nine doublings can occur.If you find a table with a low minimum, such as $1 and a high maximum, such as $3,000, you may wish to try using aMartingale system against the table.
You could use the following series of wagers: 1 2 4 8 16 32 64 128 256 512 1,024 2,048.With 12 bets in the series, you would be an odds-on favorite to win any weekend gambling contest involving even-money wagers.However, you might want to consider one thing.If you try this, sooner or later you will lose bet number 11, for $1,024.You will now have lost $2,047 and will be called on to bet $2,048 in order to win the grand sum of $1.Are you willing to risk it?If you win, you will be up exactly one buck for your efforts.However, if you lose your last wager of $2,048, you will have lost$4,095 in the gaming contest. While the risk of loss is low, it will happen at some time if you continue to wager this way, and there is no guarantee that it won't happen during your first casino excursion using this system.
Mini-Martingale
Martingale in its purest form is too risky for the amount of reward offered.Nearly every gambling expert likes to cite Martingale as an example of a losing system and then jump into a gloating mode and proclaim that all betting systems are losers.However, a Martingale system can be used with very good results if it is used on a spot basis. Assume that you are wagering on an even-money game and that you have lost the last four consecutive wagers.Usually, a three-stage Martingale against this trend continuing for three more decisions will be quite profitable and the reward will be reasonable as compared to the amount risked.
A five-stage Martingale progression can be used very profitably when it is used against a betting pattern which is less likely to occur than would normally be expected.
Grand Martingale
One criticism of Martingale is that too much is risked as compared to the potential return.For example, in the first Martingale series shown, you would have had to wager $256 in order to win a net $1.With Grand Martingale, additional chips are added to each increasedwager,so thatwhen awinfinallyoccurs, the amount won will be greater than just the amount of the first wager.A typical Grand Martingale series is: 1 3 5 15 35 75.
Martingale in all forms risks a lot to win a little.When the losses come, they will wipe out hours of profits.Another twist to using a Martingale series is to play Martingale in reverse, called an 'Anti-Martingale' betting series.With this system, winning wagers will be pressed (doubled).Whenever you encounter a long winning streak this system can produce phenomenal profits.Assume we use the following Anti-Martingale series:5 10 20 40 80.With five consecutive wins, we will $155, while our total risk is only the amount of our first wager, $5.The high-risk reward ratio is a major reason raising your wagers after wins is recommended by many gaming experts.However, as we saw two chapters back, this type of system wins very infrequently, and the many small losses overwhelm most gains, so that over 90 of all games will end with a loss.
Labouchere
With Labouchere, also known as the Cancellation System, the player sets up a series of numbers which will add up to the profit he will make if he wins this betting series.If he picks 1 2 3 as his series, his expected profit for winning this series is 1 + 2 + 3 = 6.Like the variations of Martingale, this series is used with even-money bets.
To start the series, a player will wager the sum of the two outside numbers, in this case 4(1 +3 = 4).If he wins this wager, he will cancel the two outside numbers by scratching them out, and wager the sum of the next two outside numbers.In this simple series, only the single number of 2 is left, so the player would wager 2.Ifhe also wins this wager, he will have won the series, having won 4 on the first round and 2 for the second wager, for a total of 6, the total of all bets in the series.
Any time the player loses a wager, he will add the amount lost to the series and continue to wager the sum of the two outside wagers.Let's assume the player lost the first bet of 4.He would add this wager to the series, which would now become:1 2 3 4.His next wager would be for 5, the sum of the two outside wagers.We will assume that this bet wins.Having won the bet, our players cancels the outside numbers of 1 and 4 leaving the series as: 2 3.He next wagers the sum of these two numbers, betting 5.If this wager wins the series is completed.If he loses this wager, the losing bet of 5 will be added to the series and he will continue the series.
The principal appeal of this system is that it appears to be a two for one proposition in that each win cancels two numbers while a loss only adds one number to the series.However, this isn't the case, as the player is not paid two for one on winning bets.
In testing this system, I have had bets escalate to wagers of hundreds of dollars all too frequently.This is probably the most insidious of the old time roulette systems.It is said to have been responsible for more suicides on the French Riviera than any other system.Part of the problem with this system is that the small stream of steady wins tends to lull the player into believing that the system can't lose.Unfortunately, a long enough losing streak will occur that the wagers called for will either be larger than the player's bankroll or will exceed the house limits and not be allowed.In either case, the series will be over with the end result that the player suffers a substantial loss.
Bar le casino alma qc news . This system can also be played in reverse, known as Reverse Labouchere.With Reverse Labby, as many punters call it, the amount of each win is added to the series, and the two outside numbers are canceled whenever a loss occurs.Each wager is still the sum of the two outside numbers.This system produces many small losses in exchange for an occasional win over 1,000 times the amount at risk.
Use of this approach is recounted in Norman Leigh's fascinating account of his successful effort to beat the casino in Monte Carlo by playing Labouchere in reverse ( Thirteen Against the Bank , William Morrow Co., 1976).Norman Leigh theorized that the reason so many players lose with Labouchere is that they run into the house limits or lose their playing capital and are unable to recoup losses.Since the bank has almost unlimited capital in comparison to the players, the bank can out wait most player assaults, knowing that either the house betting limit or the player's own limited financial resources will bring about the player's demise.
In using the reverse betting strategy, Leigh reasoned that this approach would most closely resemble the bank's approach to most other players. He would wait out the small losses until a large win occurred. Leigh spent months recruiting and training a team to play against the casino.His trials in pulling off this coup make for fascinating reading.I believe that one of the reasons he was eventually able to beat the casino in Monte Carlo was that his starting wagers were fairly low and the house maximums large in comparison. Consequently, he was able to keep his losses fairly low while his team played on, waiting for the monster win.
It is doubtful that this system could be used successfully now, as the spread between minimum and maximum wagers is not large enough in most casinos.The losses realized while waiting for the large win would be enormous, with the house limits on maximum wagers limiting the systems' ability to ultimately recoup the losses.
D'Alembert
This system was invented by a French mathematician, based on the assumption of equilibrium in gaming contests.D'Alembert reasoned that since winning and losing bets must eventually equal one another, a system of adding one chip after each losing bet and subtracting a chip after a winning bet would ultimately result in a win as winning wagers would always be greater than losing ones.
It is not unusual to win only ten of the first thirty wagers in an even-money betting contest.With d'Alembert's system, the player will wager higher and higher amounts until he eventually runs into our old nemesis, the house limit.
D'Alembert can be fairly successful if it is modified to include no more than nine or ten bets in a series of wagers, so that potential losses are limited.An additional modification to improve the system is to space the bets so that the win of two consecutive wagers will offset prior losses.A series which accomplishes this is 1 2 3 4 7 11 18.With this series, a player would drop back to the lowest bet after winning two consecutive wagers, such as 7 and 4.This system can be fairly successful if used by two partners betting the opposite in roulette, craps or baccarat.
Contra-d-Alembert
Like Reverse Labouchere, the idea behind Contra-d'Alembert is to reduce the amount risked while allowing profitable runs to rise to great heights.With this strategy we will increase our wager one level after a win and reduce it a level following a loss.
The only positive aspect to the strategy is that when you hit a prolonged losing streak the size of your wagers is quickly reduced.In this respect this system can help protect your bankroll.
However, the upside of using any system requiring increasing your wager following wins is limited.Trends of long, uninterrupted winning streaks are fairly rare in gaming and a system relying on piling up win after consecutive win is not going to win very often.
Here's an example.Your first bet is for one unit.You win and move up to betting two units.With another win, you wager three units and have a loss.You have won two out of three bets and have absolutely nothing to show for it.All of your profit evaporated with that single loss.
If you could always pick your spots, this system would have merit.Of course, if pigs could fly . . .well, you get the idea.It is just about impossible to know in advance when a three-wager consecutive win might occur so that you couldjump in with aContra-d'Alembert.Like so many systems, this one sounds good on paper, but is difficult to squeeze profits out of in real world gaming.
Ascot
This is another of the old time roulette systems that can be adapted to any game offering even-money bets.With Ascot, winning wagers are increased one unit at a time in a predetermined series of wagers while losing bets are lowered one step using the same betting series.An Ascot betting series can be from seven toeleven numbers.A typical series is:2 3 5 8 13 20 30.The player's first wager would be a middle number such as 8.If this wager wins, the next wager would be 13.If this wager also won, the succeeding wager would be for 20, and so on, with each win followed by an increase of one level in the betting series.The series would end with the win of the last bet in the series.For a win, that would be a win of 30.A losing series would be terminated with the loss of the lowest bet of 2.
The greatest problem with Ascot is that alternating wins and losses at the higher levels of wagers will destroy the profit potential of the series.This can be a serious flaw in any system calling for a large reduction in the amount wagered following a loss.
The Fibonacci System
Fibonacci was a mathematician who discovered a series of numbers where the sum of each two numbers in the series equals the number which follows.A Fibonacci series with twelve levels of bets would look like:1 2 3 5 8 13 21 34 55 89 144 233 for a total risked of $608.
This is a very low risk system for use with even-money bets at craps, roulette and baccarat.To use it, you will increase your bet one level following a loss.After any win, you drop your next wager one level.If you win two bets in a row, or win two out of three bets, you drop back to the first bet in the series.
This system was sold many years ago for $100 a copy with instructions to use it betting don't pass in craps.This is a good system for partners to use betting opposites.With roulette, for instance, one partner could bet red while the other wagered black.With craps, one would wager on pass line and the other on don't pass.With baccarat, one partner would bet banker and the other on player hands.
Incidentally, there are a number of derivations of the Fibonacci series of numbers, including ratios of the numbers, which are regularly used in trading stocks and commodity future contracts. This is indeed a versatile and powerful sequence of numbers.
The Parlay
A parlay or paroli is a positive progression method. In its simplest form, it consists of leaving a winning bet plus the winnings up for a second win.If you are betting $10 on an even-money bet and win $10, you parlay the wager by leaving $20 up for the next decision.If this bet wins, you will have won $30 while only risking $10.
Probably the most attractive aspect of a successful parlay is that it wins three times as much as the amount risked.However, the probability of winning two bets in a row on even-money wagers is less than one in four.For this reason, one of the better ways to use a parlay is to combine it with a series of bets where the amount wagered is increased following a loss.For example the following parlay progression could be used:2 2 3 4 6 8 12 16.To use this series, you would normally start with the first wager in the series.If this bet won, you would parlay it and next wager $4.If either the original wager or the parlay lost you would move up one level in the betting series.Any time a parlay bet is won, you will start the betting series over.If the series is lost, you may either start the series over or leave the table.
Setting up parlay progressions like the one above can be the basis for some of the best performing betting progressions in gambling.To use such a series in blackjack, which requires additional money in order to handle pair splitting and doublings, requires adjustments to the series.One way to handle this is to modify basic strategy to reduce the number of splitting and doubling plays.However, this is not a wise way to play blackjack as these moves represent one of the player's strongest winning options.A better way to handle the program of developing a winning parlay progression for blackjack is to modify the progression so that it allows for splitting and doubling opportunities.
Oscar's Grind
If you want to use a system with very little risk of loss, here's the one you want.
Oscar has a target of winning one unit at the end of any successful betting series.That's it.One unit.Here are the rules:
1.Increase your bet by one unit after every win; provided that winning the wager won't result in a series gain larger then one unit.
2.Never change the size of your bet following a loss.
Assume that your betting unit is $5 and you are betting don't pass.You find yourself fighting a hot streak and you have lost six bets in a row for a cumulative loss of $30.You continue to bet $5 since you never change the size of your wager following losses.You bet $5 again and win.Now, with one win and six losses, you are down a net $25.Following the win, you raise your bet one unit and wager $10.This wager also wins.You have reduced your net loss to $15.You raise your next wager one more unit to $15 and win.You are now even.Your final wager will revert to $5.Why?Because of the rule limiting the size of a wager to one which will not result in a gain larger than one unit.
Your last bet of $5 wins.You now have a net win of $5, having lost six bets and won four.
Even this system can take you to high levels on occasion.If you find yourself in a situation where you have occasional wins followed by multiple losses, the size of your wagers will continue to grow.If you run into this situation, you will be forced to stop the series at some point and accept a loss, rather than risking larger and larger amounts of money.
Patrick's System
John Patrick, a professional gambler turned writer, presented another positive betting system for blackjack, which can also be used for baccarat.In his John Patrick's Blackjack (Carol Publishing Group, 1995) he describes his system.He uses a system with both progressive and regressive attributes.With his system, you will start with a wager at least twice as large as the table minimum so that you have room to reduce the size of your bet after wins.After your first win, your next wager will be one-half the size of the first winning wager.For instance, if your base bet is $10 and you win, you will wager $5 next.After any net loss you will revert to the original starting bet.However, if you can manage to win the second bet in a series, you will return to the two-unit bet and increase the amount wagered after any additional win.
A series of six wins at a $10 minimum table would look like:20 10 20 30 40 50 for a total of $170 won.
Patrick suggests a way to limit losses by quitting if you lose the first four hands in a shoe or deck.
The above was taken from the book - Baccarat Attack Strategy.
Click Here for Access to Baccarat Attack Strategy
Gamblers Bookcase
5901-J Wyoming NE Suite 305
Albuquerque NM 87109
1998 - 2013 Gamblers Bookcase All Rights Reserved
Email Contact Have you ever heard of the craps pro? I can honestly say that I have been playing this craps method for a year now and over the long run I have been winning 60 of my bets with the casino paying me odds on the place bets. I'm one of the crazies out here that believe that this works. I have tried many systems and spent thousands of dollars believing there must be a way to beat the casino over the long haul. Nothing worked until I purchased this method. I'm a true believer and my wallet shows it, or maybe hundreds of hours at the table is not enough time to prove it to be true I'll let you know how I do over the next year. If you haven't heard of this method than research it and prove me wrong. Unbeatable Craps System Free
Although I have tested a lot of systems, I don't need to test all of them to know they are all worthless. No system can ever pass the test of time. It is not unusual to win for a while with a system, but if you keep playing the odds will eventually catch up to you and you will fall behind.
For more information about the futility of betting systems, please see The Truth about Betting Systems. Let me begin by saying that of all the gambling related sites, the Wizard of Odds is by far the best. My question has to do with a betting strategy for craps. My question has to do with what some people have termed variance. As you state in your Ten commandments, the house has an edge in the long term, but there are short term fluctuations.
A casino I played at had the 3,4,5 odds system where you were allowed 3x on the 4 and 10, 4x on the 5 and 9 and 5 x on the 6 and 8. I feel that with this 'system' of placing odds, you reduce the fluctuations (with respect to standard 5x odds on all numbers) in your bankroll, and change the distribution of net gain/loss per session, i.e. you would produce a sharper peak located slightly more to the loss side than with 5x odds. Is this so, and could you put some numbers to it?
That is known as 3-4-5X odds, and is now pretty common. The following table shows all the possible outcomes, for the pass and odds combined, with full odds.
Return Table with 3-4-5X Odds Event Pays Probability Return Pass line win 1 0.222222 0.222222 Pass line loss -1 0.111111 -0.111111 Point of 4 or 10 win 7 0.055556 0.388889 Point of 4 or 10 lose -4 0.111111 -0.444444 Point of 5 or 9 win 7 0.088889 0.622222 Point of 5 or 9 lose -5 0.133333 -0.666667 Point of 6 or 8 win 7 0.126263 0.883838 Point of 6 or 8 lose -6 0.151515 -0.909091 Total 1.000000 -0.014141
The standard deviation per pass line bet is 4.915632. As a moderate craps player who is of course interested in receiving every 'comp' possible, could you give advice on the best betting (craps) strategy. Tried to find it in your GREAT web site.
Unlike most gambling writers, I don't put much emphasis on betting strategies. Assuming the same game and bet, there is no one right or wrong strategy. They all behave differently in the short run, but in the long run you will give the house the same percentage of total money bet. I like your site very much. It is very informative. Thanks for putting out your thoughts. I noticed a betting strategy for craps suggested at Crappers Delight called 'classic regression'. In it he suggests, placing a 6 and 8, after a point is established. Then taking it down after one of them is hit. He said there are 10 combined ways to make the 6 and 8, but only 6 combined ways to make the 7. It sounds logical, but I've seen where you are able to show, that what appears logical on the surface is not so bright once it is analyzed. What are your thoughts on this strategy and what would the true odds be, if you did take the bets down after one hit?
This is similar to a question I got last week. Yes, it is true that there are ten ways to roll a 6 or 8, and six ways to roll a 7. However, one must not look at the probabilities alone, but weight them against the payoffs. The place bet on the 6 and 8 pays 7 to 6 odds when fair odds would pay 6 to 5. By making six unit place bets on the 6 and 8, and taking the other down if one wins, the probability of winning 7 units is 62.5 and the probability of losing 12 units is 37.5. If the player must cover both the 6 and 8, then the place bet is the way to go. This rate of return isn't bad but could be better. For the player who puts a priority on minimizing the overall house edge, the best strategy is to make combinations of pass, don't pass, come, and don't come bets, and always take the maximum allowable odds. What is the better system, or which gives me the better chance to win on craps? On the come out roll, I bet $10 on the dont and $10 on the do, and then when a point comes out I lay full odds against the number. Or is it better to just play the dont pass, and then lay the odds. I think getting passed the come out roll will increase my chances of winning.
The better system is to bet on the don't pass only and take full odds. Yes, betting on both does increase you chances of winning on any one bet. However you are suffering a higher combined house edge by betting on both the pass and don't pass and it will cost you in the long run. I played craps for the first time the other night and went from $70 to $700 with small bets on the pass odds and field bets. I then lost it all down to $6 because my bets were too large (by the dealers suggestion), and gained it back to $1000 after slowing down. For this being the first time it seems like a very easy game to win if you have patience, was it beginners luck?
Yes, it was luck. It helped that you stuck to the low house edge bets. However, next time, make the line bets with odds only, and don't bet the field, especially if it pays 2 to 1 only on both the 2 and 12. In craps, could one gain an advantage over the house by making both a Pass and Don't Pass bet (one unit each) and then playing the Don't Pass odds? Although the occasional 12 would steal one unit here and there, it seems that the seven would have an advantage over the point. At triple odds one could take 3x on the 410, 2x on the 59 and 1x on the 68.
No combination of bets can give the player an advantage. Ordre de grandeur poker . In your example you would lose one unit for every 12 on the come out roll. You don't make up for it laying the odds. While you usually win laying the odds, you have to risk more. In the end, laying the odds has zero house edge. I love to play craps and would like your opinion on a conventional method of play. Pass line and two come bets with full double odds or with one come bet? Does having three different bets working superior to two?
As long as you are backing up your pass and come bets with full odds, it doesn't make any difference how many come bets you make. However, it does reduce the overall house edge to keep the odds on your come bets working on the come out roll. In craps, does the house edge change if you make a don't pass bet then remove it if the point is 6 or 8? What if you remove it if the point is 6,8,5,or 9?
You should never remove a don't pass bet after a point is made! Once a point is made of 6 or 8 the don't pass has equity of 9.09 of the bet amount, which you would be throwing away by taking the bet down. The equity of a don't pass bet on a point of 5 or 9 is 20, and on a 4 or 10 is 33.33. Id like your thoughts on this craps strategy. I think its a Patrick system for playing dont pass. Bet one unit on both pass and dont pass. Then lays odds on the dont side. You can stop here or then make a dont come bet. After the dc travels, take the odds off your dont pass bet (if you dont like to lay odds). So now you have a unit on the dont come that pretty much got there with less risk. I know you can never get the advantage over the house, but this seems like a great way to play the dont side. You eliminate the sevens on the come out roll. And only get hurt by the 12; or the 11 on your dont come bet. P.s. Your site is the greatest.
Thanks for the compliment on my site. The best thing I can say about this system is that it composed of low house edge bets. Yes, a 12 will lose the pass bet and push the dont pass on the come out roll, this is where the house edge is. By making the pass bet you are increasing the overall house edge. If youre afraid losing you shouldnt be playing at all. Never hedge your bets. So my advice is to stick to just the dont pass and laying odds. Yes, youll lose some on the come out roll. However if you dont lose on the come out roll the dont pass bet will usually win. I am a novice, just starting to play. My question concerns the 'Five Count Doey/Dont' System. The way I understand the system:
Wait until the shooter establishes a point.
Play both come/dont come (same amount). Until you have a maximum of four numbers
After the shooter has rolled five times without rolling a 7, take odds on all your numbers on the front side.
The rationale: Limit your exposure until you find a 'qualified' (five rolls without a 7) shooter. Only betting the odds so there is no 'house edge'! Can you compare this system with just playing pass/come and taking the odds?
As I stated in the other craps strategy question you are only mixing another house edge bet into the game by betting on both the pass and dont pass, or come and dont come. It is also not going to help to wait until a shooter hits five points. The probability of making a point is the same for me and you as it is for somebody who just threw 100 points in a row. In other words, the past does not matter. As I stated to the person who asked the other question (whom I think may also be you) dont make opposite bets, just stick to either the do or dont side and always back up your bets with the odds. The Kelly strategy for betting requires a positive edge to be effective. I play craps and I give the house less than a 1 edge. Once a week I get comps of $62. I gamble only 1 1/2 hours and my total betting doesnt reach $3000. Theoretically I earn approximately $30 per session. Would the Kelly strategy be helpful to me?
Unless bankroll preservation is very important to you then Kelly betting wont help. I would just flat bet. Nice strategy to milk the comp system. The American Mensa Guide to Casino Gambling has the following 'anything but seven' combination of craps bets that shows a net win on any number except 7. Here's how much MENSA advises to bet in the 'Anything but 7' system:
5- place $5
6- place $6
8- place $6
field- $5
total= $22 Unbeatable Craps System
They claim the house edge is 1.136. How is that possible if every individual bet made has a higher house edge?
Good question. To confirm their math I made the following table, based on a field bet paying 3 to 1 on a 12. The lower right cell does shows an expected loss of 25 cents over $22 bet. So the house edge is indeed .25/22 = 1.136.
Mensa Anything but Seven Combo Number Probability Field Place 5 Place 6 Place 8 Win Return 2 0.027778 10 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 10 0.277778 3 0.055556 5 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 5 0.277778 4 0.083333 5 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 5 0.416667 5 0.111111 -5 7 0.000000 0.000000 2 0.222222 6 0.138889 -5 0.000000 7 0.000000 2 0.277778 7 0.166667 -5 -5 -6 -6 -22 -3.666667 8 0.138889 -5 0.000000 0.000000 7 2 0.277778 9 0.111111 5 0 0.000000 0 5 0.555556 10 0.083333 5 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 5 0.416667 11 0.055556 5 0 0.000000 0.000000 5 0.277778 12 0.027778 15 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 15 0.416667 Total 1 -0.25
The reason the overall house edge appears to be less than the house edge of each individual bet is because the house edge on place bets is generally measured as expected player loss per bet resolved .
However, in this case the player is only keeping the place bets up for one roll. This significantly reduces the house edge on the place bets from 4.00 to 1.11 on the 5 and 9, and from 1.52 to 0.46 on the 6 and 8.
For you purists who think I am inconsistent in measuring the house edge on place bets as per bet resolved (or ignoring ties) then I invite you to visit my craps appendix 2 where all craps bets are measured per roll (including ties). What is the best way to make money at craps consistently?
Craig from Los Angeles
No. I had to Google this to find out what this is. This appears to me to be an amusing urban legend about some young scientists who developed a winning craps system. The story is told at Quatloos. I would file this under other fictional stories that have become mistaken for fact, like Joshuas missing day. As I have said hundreds of times, not only can betting systems not beat games like craps, they cant even dent the house edge. I have a question about a series of bets in craps. The strategy is called the 'Iron Cross.' It involves a bet on the 5, 6, 8, and the field. I read up on this, and found that this particular bet will pay on every roll that is not a 7. I was told that this gives you the lowest house edge. What are all the various odds and what-nots to go along with it?
If the player bets $5 on the field and 5, and $6 on the 6 and 8, then he will have a net win of $2 on the 5, 6, and 8, $10 on the 2, $15 on the 12, and $5 on the other field numbers, assuming that the 12 pays 3 to 1 on the field. The player will lose $22 on a 7. On a per roll basis, the player can expect to lose 25 cents compared to $22 in bets, for a house edge of 1.136.
This begs the question, why is this lower than the individual house edge of each bet made? Its not. The reason it seems that way is the result of comparing apples to oranges. The house edge of place bets is usually expressed as the expected loss per bet resolved. Looking at the individual bets on a per-roll basis, the house edge on the 5 is 1.11, and on the 6 and 8 is 0.46, according to my craps appendix 2. Comparing apples to apples, the house edge is a weighted average of the house edge on the field, 5, 6, and 8, on a per-roll basis, or (5/22)2.778 + (5/22)1.111 + (6/22)0.463 + (6/22)0.463 = 1.136. What is your opinion of the 5-Count strategy in craps?
For the benefit of other readers, the 5-Count is a method of slow-playing craps, as discussed in Golden Touch Dice Control Revolution by Frank Scoblete and Dominator. As the book states, it is a way of betting nothing on some rolls, reducing your expected loss on random shooters, while still getting the full comp value of table time.
The way the 5-Count works is you start counting rolls as soon as a new shooter throws any point number. When you get to five rolls after you start counting, the shooter is deemed worthy, and you start betting. However, you if the 5th roll is not a point number, it doesnt count.
The book says you will only be betting 43 of the time, which I agree with. It is common for craps players to not bet, bet small, or bet the dont pass on new shooters, as a way to qualify him. Once a shooter has made a point, or thrown lots of point numbers, the other players will gain confidence in him, and start betting with him. So, this kind of strategy seems natural. When casinos rate your average bet, they dont lower the average for betting nothing some of the time. However, sometimes they will dock your time, especially if you are betting big.
An alternative strategy is to wait until the shooter makes a point. Under this strategy you will only be betting 40.6 of the time, less than the 43.5 with the 5-Count. Imagine a craps player who takes maximum odds, say 10x, on his pass line and come bets reducing the house edge to 0.18. He avoids other bets that give the house a bigger edge. He is an 'astute' right bettor in every way except this: he is determined to lose. Through bankroll management, and a determined effort to only leave the table a 'loser,' he hopes he can look back on his years of craps playing and say, 'I wagered $1 million at the craps table over the years and gave back $50,000 to the house; because of my skill, I left 5 at the table.' Is he deluding himself? Is he doomed, in spite of his efforts to leave the table a loser every time, to only give the house roughly 0.18 or $1800?
Yes! Ive said many times that betting systems not only cant beat a house edge game, they cant even dent it. That includes denting it in the houses favor. In other words, even if he tried to lose, he still only gives up 0.18 over the long-run, under your assumptions. Over a shorter time, he probably could do this, but not over 'years.' Some might argue that to deliberately lose, the player should do an anti-Martingale, where the player kept pressing his bets until he lost. However, a problem there is that a winning player will eventually reach the table maximum, which is rather low in craps. It just goes to show how futile betting systems are.
